|  | | | Used and New: | | |
| All | |
| $520.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $540.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $560.00+ $5.12 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $560.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $599.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $620.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $625.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $632.86 This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. | Used
- Mint | | |
| $649.99+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $685.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $699.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $699.99+ $11.00 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $799.99+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $800.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $1,119.95+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $1,148.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | New | | |
| $1,199.99Shipping Free | New | | |
| New | |
| $1,148.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | New | | |
| $1,199.99Shipping Free | New | | |
| Used | |
| $520.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $540.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $560.00+ $5.12 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $560.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $599.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $620.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $625.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $632.86 This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. | Used
- Mint | | |
| $649.99+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $685.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $699.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $699.99+ $11.00 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $799.99+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $800.00+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| $1,119.95+ $5.49 *Shipping | Used
- Mint | | |
| | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review: ( 354 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
975 of 987 found the following review helpful:
 Groundbreaking lens May 14, 2006
By S. L. Miller
By now there are enough pro reviews out there for experienced shooters to read the handwriting on the wall. No, this is not a 17-35 and 70-200 wrapped into a tiny package. You can't have that for any amount of money. The 18-200VR is NOT meant to challenge the exotics like my 70-200VR or the 200-400VR. It's not even meant to take on a prime. It's designed to be the ultimate one lens solution when you don't want a bag full of heavy glass along for the ride. It features moderately fast (but not very) optics, vibration reduction and a lot of work to keep CA and distortion down. This it achieves with some success, but distortion is still obvious at 18mm. Distortion is sever enough at the wide end to require correction in post (easy to do), but this is NOT lens for those who shoot architecture professionally. This type of distortion is TYPICAL for a lens of this type.
I'm sorry, but those who have panned this lens either got a bad one (quite possible with early batch issues reported) or just don't understand what a walk-around lens is for. This is what we all hoped the 24-120 VR would be, but unlike that lens it gets much more done for just 200 dollars more. Anyone who says there are lenses like this for less...well where? No other superzoom is this sharp, has so little CA and throws in VR II as well...and in a small package!
Now...how good is it in the real world? VERY GOOD. It's a match for the sharp little 28-200G which means it's only a bit less sharp than the 70-200VR which costs twice as much. My first images with this lens were stunning, detailed and fairly sharp to the edges above F5. Close focus gives near macro results and again this lens is SHARP! Focus speed is quite fast of course, but I feel that the 18-70 kit lens is a hair quicker. You could shoot all day with this miracle and do it all without feeling like you need a giant lens. If, like me, you find yourself shooting mostly in the 35-200mm range on a DSLR, this lens makes a lot of sense. It also displayed deeper color saturation and contrast than either the 28-200G or 50mm 1.8. Did I mention that I'm impressed?
Build quality is good, but not great. It's hard to be impressed with any lens build when compared to the 70-200VR. The 18-200 zoom is a bit stiff, the manual focus a bit loose. I suspect Nikon dialed up the zoom stiffness due to early problems with lens creep early on. It's not creeping at all. The size of the lens is only a bit bigger than the kit lens, perhaps as bulky at the Tokina 12-24 if you have one of those.
VR II exceeds all expectations I was able to shoot sharp shots at 1.10th sec exposure. But remember this is NOT fast glass. A moving object in dim light will be blurred at such slow shutter speeds. Thus far this is an impressive effort from Nikon. Even an experienced shooter could find this lens on the camera most days and be happy. "Average" shooters will need nothing more because this lens is that good. The only areas for improvement given the real limits of optical design are in the build quality, which could be a bit better. In the end, even at 700 dollars plus, this lens is pretty hard to resist.
And no, this is not a "kit lens with VR." The kit lens only reaches to 70mm. The kit lens also can't do near macro work as this lens can. The kit lens is also not as sharp. And of course this lens has the latest version of VR that works superbly. There is simply no other lens like this on the market currently. Again, if you're thinking that this lens should be perfect and doesn't require compromises to achieve it's design goals, please do your homework before buying. If you need a zoom to cover this range at F2.8, with no distortion and small size please call Mr. Scott aboard the Starship Enterprise.
For those who question the sharpness of this lens, be aware that there are online tests showing it's even sharper at the corners than the legendary 17-35 2.8! Against my 70-200VR I see a SLIGHT sharpness advantage with the 70-200, but only visible with a 100% crop. Or to put things even more in perspective, this lens works nicely on a D200. Search the forums for yourself. Most D200 owners are reporting great sharpness even with pro bodies.
This lens is simply a ton of fun for people who like to take pictures
185 of 189 found the following review helpful:
 Not the "Perfect Lens", but close Jun 10, 2006
By W. R. Stockstill Jr.
""Bill""
I waited 6 weeks for mine to arrive and used it almost immediately at an airshow featuring the Blue Angels. I took about 3 gigibytes of pictures at that show. I used the lens with a D50 in sports mode to capture the fast moving planes. It was a great day with not a cloud in the sky. When I later looked at the pictures I was dismayed to see significant light fall off or vignetting on the shots taken at 200mm with the lens wide open at f5.6.
This light fall off is the most significant problem I have noticed with this lens. I contacted Nikon and they said it was normal. Since the lens is made for the smaller DX sensor the diameter of the lens is smaller. This causes mechanical shadowing at long zoom lengths with the lens at the wide open settings of f5.6 until about f11. All lenses have light fall off, to some degree, at the edges. When you use a regular lens made for 35mm with the smaller digital DX sensors the fall off is outside the sensor and not seen. The light fall off was especially noticable with the blue/uniform background. If the background was "busy" the falloff would be less noticable.
Vignetting/light fall off is also usually seen on the wide side of zooms like this. I have not seen any with this lens. I do use a Hoya Pro 1/2 thickness filter so that a shadow is not made when shooting wide angles of 18mm - 28mm or so. I saw a technical review of this lens that noted it had significant outer distortion on pictures taken at 18mm but I have not seen that.
Pros
-Light weight for range
-Large range
-Vibration Reduction
-Sharp, crisp pictures with vibrant colors
-Fast Focus with manual focus adjustment ring for fine tuning
Cons
-Light fall off at long telephoto settings and large f stops
-Vibration Reduction helps with handheld shots but does not stop subject motion in low light, you still need a fast lens for that
-High price and limited availability
-Might get light fall off at wide angles unless expensive 1/2
width filter is used
-Lens Creep (but most telephotos have this to some extent)
I have since used the lens to shoot the Special Olympics. The outside track and field photos are excellent. Inside shots where hit and miss with subject movement in low light being the biggest culprit (was shooting no flash at 1600 iso).
For about the same money you can get a Nikon or Sigma 2.8 lens that covers approx. 80-200mm. I have read several opinions that you will still have fewer bad pictures with the VR of this lens and I believe that is true. It is not a perfect lens, but it takes great pictures once you know its limitations.
One tip - If you get this lens, when you use it on a tripod turn VR off, it will actually cause your photos to be blurry.
UPDATE-Fall 2008 I have stopped using this lens and am instead using the Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Aspherical IF Macro Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras which has "Vibration Control" and a wider range going all the way out to 270mm. It focuses almost as fast and has a wider diameter hence the vignetting of the Nikon is gone. One last thing is that it has much less lens creep and even a lock at 18mm.
302 of 317 found the following review helpful:
Best walkaround lens ever made. Feb 12, 2006
By Arturo Fukuda Ll
My thoughts:
- It's sharp at the center at all apertures and at all focal lenghts, however it falls short on the edges ("sweet point" at f10 or f11, IMO)
- It's a very contrasty lens.
- The VR system works very very good (Im able to get steady handheld shots even at 1/1.3s)
- It's well-built, solid and reliable.
- The autofocus speed is very fast and accurate.
- does the lens creep? Yes, it does (sometimes) but I really dont mind it.
- The 11.1X zoom is unbeatable, better than any zoom ever made, and it's faster at long end than the Sigma or Tamron ones (f5.6 vs 6.3)
- It's a highly recommendend lens, no doubt on it.
- Some sample images at full resolution taken with D50 can be found on the link below:
http://www.pbase.com/afukuda/cusco_puno
123 of 126 found the following review helpful:
WONDERFUL lens... NOT a cure all Apr 27, 2006
By P. Hamm
"p-squared"
NOTE: I changed this review on May 15, somewhat to respond to some of the other comments.
Some of the reviews you've read on the internet are a little over-hyped. And some of them, or at least some portions of them, are not. I'm using this lens on a D50... Great results so far.
Well, you know the specs by now. two ED elements, three aspheric, Silent Wave Motor, VR II, Internal Focusing (NO movement of the front element!) and great zoom range (beware, this thing gets obnoxiously huge when zoomed in to 200. It just looks plain silly, especially with the lens hood, which I left in the box anyway.)
I am not going to go into detailed specifics of the distortion, since that's been dealt with better by Ken Rockwell, Thom Hogan and others (EXCELLENT reviews... seek them out...). But it's severe enough at the wide end that you will probably want to correct it (as best you can) in Photoshop. In real-life shooting, it isn't a huge deal. (UPDATE: In real life shooting of hundreds of images so far, I've found NOT ONE SINGLE INSTANCE where I wanted to bother "fixing" it. I repeat... There is distortion, but it is NOT a problem.) I find that when I zoom in to 24 it is totally usable to all intents and purposes, and if I REALLY want to use something you shot at 18, unless there are some REALLY straight lines in it you might have no need of correction. So, in short, the distortion is there, but so what. It's bound to be in a lens of this range.
Some other reviewers report better resistance to flare than I am experiencing. It is still pretty good in a lens of this many elements, but it is hardly "nonexistent" as some have reported. (UPDATE! I have had only ONE image "ruined" by flare. It was pointed at the sun. Flare is excellent on this lens!) Mine is made in Thailand and earlier ones in Japan. I hope that I got the same quality as the lucky early adopters, but this could account for that difference. I still don't use the lens hood because I step the filter threads up to 77 and don't want to take off my UV filter ever time I use it.
I actually find I can stack my polarizer on top of my UV (which is on a 72 - 77mm step-up ring - Curse you Nikon for not making the threads 77!) and STILL use this lens with no real vignetting at 24 and above. Now I REALLY want a 12-24, but that's a whole other story (don't have the dough).
Focus is LUDICROUSLY fast, either manually or auto. The AF-S seems to be the real deal in this lens, with a real Silent Wave Motor, unlike some "partial" AF-S lenses NIkon has been selling lately. (Low light is a problem sometimes... duh...)
Now, I took two stars off for the distortion (necessary, I admit), and the slight chromatic aberrations I'm getting on slight over-exposures, and the reduced speed as you zoom out to 200, but it gets BOTH of those back easily for the INCREDIBLE VR technology and the fact that I have had NOTHING but excellent images come out of it. It kinda eats batteries for lunch compared with not using VR, but it's still usuallly lasting me at least 300 exposures with an external SB600 as flash. (why haven't you gotten a backup battery yet?!?). I actually shot some indoor 1600 stuff hand-held all the way at 200mm (300 equiv) and 1/40 or 1/50. AMAZING! I understand it works well in low light at the wide end too. Haven't tried any available darkness landscapes yet, so I can't say.
So... It IS a do all and be all lens! Maybe not for the pro, but certainly for the guy who wants to take some great shots and especially the guy who doesn't want to miss a shot because he's changing lenses (and letting dust into his camera...)
I tried to change my review to 5 stars, Amazon won't let me. :-(
It's a great lens. Just buy it!
150 of 155 found the following review helpful:
 Great as a "one-stop shop", but consider carefully Dec 13, 2007
By Bernard Mills
I have had this lens for ~2 months and use it on my D80. I also have a few other lenses, two primes and one wide-angle zoom.
Before purchasing this lens I would encourage anyone to search online and read the technical reviews of it. I agree with their consensus which is:
- if you want a very flexible zoom that gives you VR and a wide range of focal lengths without too much weight or bulk, and if you don't want to be switching between lenses, then this is the lens for you. It's good enough to cover most shots in a range of common conditions. If you want the quality of SLR but only one lens then go for it.
- if you want great optical quality (ie low distortion etc), and/or wide enough aperture to give low light ability/fast shutter speed, then the design compromises in this lens make it a questionable choice for you.
In short, the designers have definitely preferenced this lens's amazing flexibility at the cost of other attributes found in higher quality (though less versatile in some respects) photographic glass.
This design balance may suit you brilliantly or it may not suit you at all. It all depends on what you are buying the lens for, and what sort of use you intend to have for your photographic equipment.
I'm happy with mine as a flexible "one-stop-shop" tool, especially when I'm travelling light and don't exactly know what I'm going to come across. It does give pretty reasonable images all told, and a fantastic "advanced point-and-shoot" capability.
But does it spend much time on my camera when I have all my other gear on hand and when I want to take a specific high-quality, technically thought out shot? No.
PS: a general-use alternative that a number of people recommend is a 2-lens kit made up of the 18-55 and 55-200. Both come in VR these days and are inexpensive yet arguably better optical quality. Bottom line is you get the same total focal length range and slightly better optics for about 2/3 of the cost of 18-200, with the only downside being the need to switch between the lenses.
See all 354 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
| | |
